Skip to main content


1) Introduction
2) Political Sovereign Authority
3) Jurisprudence as the formal science of positive law.

Holland is also, supporter of analytical school of positivism. Benthom made actual law as a subject matter of his study, Austin open a new era, of jurisprudence and determined the province of jurisprudence. According to Austin, the science of jurisprudence is concerned with positive law or any law strictly so-called. Jurisprudence has nothing to do with the goodness or badness of law.
Austin further divided the subject into `general’ and ‘particular’ jurisprudence. According to him," general jurisprudence" includes such subjects or ends of law as are common to all systems while,’ particular jurisprudence’ is confined only to the study of any actual system of law or of any portion of it.

Holland says, "law is general rule of external human action enforced by sovereign political authority”. All other rules for the guidance of human action arc laws merely by analogy:
propositions which are not rules for human action are laws by metaphor only.

If we take law as rule Of action, we have following kinds of laws.
i. Imperative,
ii. Physical of scientific.
iii. Natural or moral
iv. Conventional.
v. Customary.
vi. Practical or technical.
vii. International-or law of nations.
viii. Civil law or law of states

Holland defined jurisprudence as " the formal science of positive law."

He criticized the division of the subject matters into 'general' and 'particular' given by Austin. He pointed out that the science deals with relations of mankind, which are regarded as having legal consequences, but not with the rules, which create those relations. Though it may be possible to speak of a branch of that science which studies how those human relations are regulated in the laws of many individual country, to call it as "particular jurisprudence ". In the sense in which Austin has used it is not right, Holland's formal science of positive law itself was criticized by later writers. He could not demarcate the boundary of subject properly.

Popular posts from this blog

Art of Cross Examination used by: Sr. Adv. Ram Jethmalani, Supreme court

“The issue of a cause rarely depends upon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the skill with which the advocate conducts his cross examination.”- Francis L. Wellman

When asked, the undisputed champion of cross-examination, Mr. Ram Jethmalanidescribed the art of cross-examination as the most effective weapon for the discovery of truth, provided the objective is not to confound a truthful witness but to extract truth from an unwilling witness.
The search for truth is the ultimate and idealistic end of all litigated matter in a court trial, and that truth is obtained due to the process of cross examination in the conduct of litigation.

Mr. Jethmalani understands that in India where large number of complaints and cases are filed in civil and criminal courts every day, delay in justice is common due to the rapidly growing pendency of cases in courts. Examination of witnesses plays an important …

Rights to Constitutional Remedies- Writs under Art. 32 and 226 of Indian Constitution

Under the common law system, a writ is meant to be a written order, informal in nature which is issued by either by an administrative or judicial body. The aim of this paper is to identify writs as a constitutional remedy. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part would deal with the origin, purpose of writs which would examine the historical developments that took place with respect to writs. The second part of the paper would be specific to the Indian Legal Systems. This part would closely examine the existence and use of writs as per the provisions of the Indian Constitution as a constitutional right to remedy. The third part of the paper would elaborate on all the types of writ remedies and its usage in the Indian Legal System. The last part of the paper would be the conclusion that would deal with appraisal and the critical analysis of writs. The purpose of this paper is to celebrate writs as a powerful constitution remedy and highlight the importance of the same in th…

Dishonour of Cheque: Punishment under NI Act

INTRODUCTION:Negotiable Instrument literally means any promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, and in easier terms, it means a piece of paper which will hold the promisee to claim some amount of money out of the paper. Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines the word cheque. It further is classified as Bearer Cheque, Crossed Cheque, Self Cheque, Post-dated cheque, Banker’s cheque and traveller’s cheque. In general sense, cheques are the easiest way to transact in the present times. One may easily transfer money through cheques over long distances on a daily basis. On one hand, wherein cheques are used to transact daily over the relationship of trust, it is always advisable on the face of it during transactions that the cheque be issued in the crossed account payee section to avoid its misuse. It is also stated that the transactions as these cheques are not negotiable to any other person than payee, it gives a prima facie advantage to both of them. In a layman’s langua…