Skip to main content

SPECIAL RELIEF ACT, 1963

lawji-specific-relief

INTRODUCTION
The term 'relief' means the remedy granted for some wrong or injury.
There are two types of remedies :
Remedy by which the aggrieved party obtains the same thing to which he is entitled. 
Remedy by which the aggrieved party does not obtain the very thing to which he is entitled but compensation for the loss.
The first remedy is the "Specific Relief', while the second remedy is the "Compensatory Relief'. Thus, specific relief is a relief in specie which aims at the "exact" fulfillment of an obligation. It is also known as equitable relief.
The concept of specific relief is governed by various provisions of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
PRINCIPLES UPON WHICH SPECIFIC RELIEF IS GRANTED
Following are the principles upon which remedy of specific relief is granted :
1.  Damages is not an adequate remedy : Where damages in money are not an adequate remedy or relief, the court grants the remedy of specific relief.
2.  Discretion of the Court : An aggrieved party can always apply for the specific relief but whether specific relief will be granted or not it depends upon the discretion of the court. But this discretion of the court is not arbitrary, depending upon the will and pleasure of the court. It has to be exercised on sound and established principles of equity.
3.  Specific relief granted only for enforcing individual and civil rights and not for enforcing Penal laws : Specific relief can be granted only for the purpose of enforcing individual civil rights. Thus, enforcement of Penal law is not possible, except where enforcement of a Penal law is merely incidental to the grant of specific relief.
For example, A threatens B to publish a libel against him. B obtains the injunction order of the Court against A to protect his own rights. However in the course of protecting B's rights, penal law has also incidentally been enforced because as per Indian Penal Code, libel is also a crime.
RECOVERY OF POSSESSION OF PROPERTY
The Specific Relief Act, 1963 lays down the law in this regard under the following two heads :
1.      Recovery of immovable property; and
2.      Recovery of movable property.

Popular posts from this blog

Art of Cross Examination used by: Sr. Adv. Ram Jethmalani, Supreme court

“The issue of a cause rarely depends upon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the skill with which the advocate conducts his cross examination.”- Francis L. Wellman

When asked, the undisputed champion of cross-examination, Mr. Ram Jethmalanidescribed the art of cross-examination as the most effective weapon for the discovery of truth, provided the objective is not to confound a truthful witness but to extract truth from an unwilling witness.
The search for truth is the ultimate and idealistic end of all litigated matter in a court trial, and that truth is obtained due to the process of cross examination in the conduct of litigation.

Mr. Jethmalani understands that in India where large number of complaints and cases are filed in civil and criminal courts every day, delay in justice is common due to the rapidly growing pendency of cases in courts. Examination of witnesses plays an important …

Rights to Constitutional Remedies- Writs under Art. 32 and 226 of Indian Constitution

Under the common law system, a writ is meant to be a written order, informal in nature which is issued by either by an administrative or judicial body. The aim of this paper is to identify writs as a constitutional remedy. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part would deal with the origin, purpose of writs which would examine the historical developments that took place with respect to writs. The second part of the paper would be specific to the Indian Legal Systems. This part would closely examine the existence and use of writs as per the provisions of the Indian Constitution as a constitutional right to remedy. The third part of the paper would elaborate on all the types of writ remedies and its usage in the Indian Legal System. The last part of the paper would be the conclusion that would deal with appraisal and the critical analysis of writs. The purpose of this paper is to celebrate writs as a powerful constitution remedy and highlight the importance of the same in th…

Dishonour of Cheque: Punishment under NI Act

INTRODUCTION:Negotiable Instrument literally means any promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, and in easier terms, it means a piece of paper which will hold the promisee to claim some amount of money out of the paper. Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines the word cheque. It further is classified as Bearer Cheque, Crossed Cheque, Self Cheque, Post-dated cheque, Banker’s cheque and traveller’s cheque. In general sense, cheques are the easiest way to transact in the present times. One may easily transfer money through cheques over long distances on a daily basis. On one hand, wherein cheques are used to transact daily over the relationship of trust, it is always advisable on the face of it during transactions that the cheque be issued in the crossed account payee section to avoid its misuse. It is also stated that the transactions as these cheques are not negotiable to any other person than payee, it gives a prima facie advantage to both of them. In a layman’s langua…

Advt.