Skip to main content

Right to Privacy Violated- Aadhaar Card (UID Card)

http://www.lawji.in/2017/07/right-to-privacy-violated-aadhaar-card.html

Aadhar cards are issued by the Indian Government as identification cards,in an attempt to put all Indian citizens on record by providing them with a 12-digit unique identification number. The aadhar project is an attempt to capture all details, including demographic and biometric information of every Indian citizen. The aadhar card does not attempt to replace previously existing identification documents but rather a pre requisite in applying for other things.

This initiative taken by the Indian government was not a walk in the park and has been met by a series of legal challenges.

In the present matter the court was examining whether Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act brought in by the Finance Act, 2017 is constitutionally valid. This provision makes it mandatory for all taxpayers to produce their 12-digit unique identification number while applying for a Permanent Account Number(PAN). Faliure to link the two would result in the former being deemed invalid.

In the case of Binoy Viswam v. Union of India (W.P.(C)247/2017), S.G. Vombatkere & Anr. v. Union of India (W.P.(C) 277/2017)
Stage by putting light on the fact that the insertion of Section 139AA was not part of original finance bill rather it was introduced on the last day after 30-40 statutes had already been amended.

In order to prove section following grounds were brought forward:
It was argued that the entire system of Aadhar is unreliable , quoting numerous leaks that have occurred as evidence. A letter written by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology confirms that the data, which the Government has been carefully guarding, has been leaked online

The preamble of the Constitution claims to guarantee dignity of the individual , compelling people to part with their biometric data can be said to be a violation to their fundamental right to life as was guaranteed by article 21 of the constitution. When there is a written Constitution that the citizens have given to themselves, the state, however powerful has limited power. This concept of limited government was recognised in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Thakur Bharat Singh.

Right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to protect one’s body from harm, which in turn includes the right to not part with one’s fingerprints and iris scans.

Incase the object of the statute is discriminatory, then the statute can be said to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Before invoking the test of reasonable classification, it is essential to check the object of the Act itself is discriminatory or not. Aadhar discriminates between two classes of assesses – those who volunteer to part with their biometric data and those who do not.

A statutory provision that completely takes away the voluntary nature of Aadhar and compels expropriation of a person’s fingerprints and iris scans is per se violative of Article 21. It also brought light to the fact that “informational self determination” should be included as a feature of Articles 21, 14 and 19 of the Constitution.

Aadhaar is applicable to children as well, the point of question was question how can they be compelled to be yoked to a digital network system like Aadhaar before they even reach the age of free consent.

Conclusion
In the landmark case of Binoy Vishwam effectively held that policy goals override rights, furthermore the court decided not to examine questions related to human dignity and privacy, on the ground that issues affecting Article 21 will be examined by a larger bench to be set up by the court. However, it granted relief to people, who have not enrolled for Aadhaar, by stating that their PAN cards cannot be invalidated till the time when the matter is finally decided by such a bench.

Popular posts from this blog

Art of Cross Examination used by: Sr. Adv. Ram Jethmalani, Supreme court

“The issue of a cause rarely depends upon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the skill with which the advocate conducts his cross examination.”- Francis L. Wellman

When asked, the undisputed champion of cross-examination, Mr. Ram Jethmalanidescribed the art of cross-examination as the most effective weapon for the discovery of truth, provided the objective is not to confound a truthful witness but to extract truth from an unwilling witness.
The search for truth is the ultimate and idealistic end of all litigated matter in a court trial, and that truth is obtained due to the process of cross examination in the conduct of litigation.

Mr. Jethmalani understands that in India where large number of complaints and cases are filed in civil and criminal courts every day, delay in justice is common due to the rapidly growing pendency of cases in courts. Examination of witnesses plays an important …

Rights to Constitutional Remedies- Writs under Art. 32 and 226 of Indian Constitution

Under the common law system, a writ is meant to be a written order, informal in nature which is issued by either by an administrative or judicial body. The aim of this paper is to identify writs as a constitutional remedy. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part would deal with the origin, purpose of writs which would examine the historical developments that took place with respect to writs. The second part of the paper would be specific to the Indian Legal Systems. This part would closely examine the existence and use of writs as per the provisions of the Indian Constitution as a constitutional right to remedy. The third part of the paper would elaborate on all the types of writ remedies and its usage in the Indian Legal System. The last part of the paper would be the conclusion that would deal with appraisal and the critical analysis of writs. The purpose of this paper is to celebrate writs as a powerful constitution remedy and highlight the importance of the same in th…

Dishonour of Cheque: Punishment under NI Act

INTRODUCTION:Negotiable Instrument literally means any promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, and in easier terms, it means a piece of paper which will hold the promisee to claim some amount of money out of the paper. Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines the word cheque. It further is classified as Bearer Cheque, Crossed Cheque, Self Cheque, Post-dated cheque, Banker’s cheque and traveller’s cheque. In general sense, cheques are the easiest way to transact in the present times. One may easily transfer money through cheques over long distances on a daily basis. On one hand, wherein cheques are used to transact daily over the relationship of trust, it is always advisable on the face of it during transactions that the cheque be issued in the crossed account payee section to avoid its misuse. It is also stated that the transactions as these cheques are not negotiable to any other person than payee, it gives a prima facie advantage to both of them. In a layman’s langua…

Advt.