Skip to main content

Adultery laws in India: Whether Biased Against Women Or Men

Adultery Laws In India

Commonly called as 'Cheating', Adultery is an act where a married person gets involved in sexual relations with someone else than his wife. Extra marital affairs are not new to our society, even the Puranas have described cases like that of Indra and Ahalya, which led to the lady turning into a sculpture. The act has been considered as immoral and sinuous since ages.The Vishnu Puran (3.11) says that 'A man should not think incontinently of another's wife, much less address her to that end; for such a man will be reborn in a future life as a creeping insect. He who commits adultery is punished both here and hereafter; for his days in this world are cut short, and when dead he falls into hell'. Other scriptures of different religions such as Buddhism, Taoism, Christianity etc. also describe the act of adultery as immoral.

Adultery Laws In India

In the earlier times, women were treated as the greater sinner in cases of adultery, and higher the class of the women higher was the degree of the crime. Not, much has changed in the Indian society since, but the fact that we now have laws. Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code defines adultery as 'Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery'. Also, Section 13 (1) (i) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 describes adultery as “Any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, may, on a petition presented by either the husband or the wife, be dissolved by a decree of divorce on the ground that the other party has, after the solemnization of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse.”

This might be one of the rare instances where the Religious Law makes more sense than the secular one. Criminalizing adultery is one thing, but being gender biased about it is another. Our penal code makes it very clear that in a case of an extra marital affair, it is ONLY the man who is responsible and should be punished.

Let's Read the statute line by line. It starts with " Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and he knows or has the reason to believe...." All okay till here but as you jump to the next line, " be the wife of another man without the consent or connivance of that man.." in the next few words the statute prescribes a jail time which can extend to 5 years and/or fine for the man involved in the affair.

Adultery Laws in India

There are many statutes which seem unjust whether on the grounds of gender, caste, religion etc. but in the end, there always is a scope of a just interpretation on ad hoc basis by the judiciary. Although in this case, the statute ends with the words "In such cases, the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor ". That's where the statute totally eradicates any scope of a just interpretation.

There has been a great discussion with regard to the law not being gender neutral. The Malimath Committee, back in 2003, in its report regarding 'Reforms in Criminal Justice System', suggested to the union government about the required ingredient of gender equality in the statute, but no suggestion has been implemented till date.

A man can, although, move the court for a divorce petition on the ground of adultery by his wife and according to section 125 (4) of the CrPC a man need not pay monthly allowance, otherwise required, to his wife living in adultery.


We've overcome the medieval times when the woman in an extra marital affair was considered as the prime sinner, but how far have we come? The adultery law makes it clear that a married man is to be punished with a half-a-decade sentence for committing adultery but a woman, on the other hand, may have as many extra marital affairs as she likes. With the society moving towards the direction of gender equality this law has a clear-cut gender biasedness. This also shows the objective approach of the laws towards women. An approach which thinks that it's the men who rule the world and make use of women. This law makes the women superior and inferior at the same time. With the number of cases increasing day by day, there's a strong need for amending these laws towards gender equality, that's the best way the government can contribute in fighting those who use the law as a weapon for their own benefit.

Popular posts from this blog

Art of Cross Examination used by: Sr. Adv. Ram Jethmalani, Supreme court

“The issue of a cause rarely depends upon a speech and is but seldom even affected by it. But there is never a cause contested, the result of which is not mainly dependent upon the skill with which the advocate conducts his cross examination.”- Francis L. Wellman

When asked, the undisputed champion of cross-examination, Mr. Ram Jethmalanidescribed the art of cross-examination as the most effective weapon for the discovery of truth, provided the objective is not to confound a truthful witness but to extract truth from an unwilling witness.
The search for truth is the ultimate and idealistic end of all litigated matter in a court trial, and that truth is obtained due to the process of cross examination in the conduct of litigation.

Mr. Jethmalani understands that in India where large number of complaints and cases are filed in civil and criminal courts every day, delay in justice is common due to the rapidly growing pendency of cases in courts. Examination of witnesses plays an important …

Rights to Constitutional Remedies- Writs under Art. 32 and 226 of Indian Constitution

Under the common law system, a writ is meant to be a written order, informal in nature which is issued by either by an administrative or judicial body. The aim of this paper is to identify writs as a constitutional remedy. The paper is divided into four parts. The first part would deal with the origin, purpose of writs which would examine the historical developments that took place with respect to writs. The second part of the paper would be specific to the Indian Legal Systems. This part would closely examine the existence and use of writs as per the provisions of the Indian Constitution as a constitutional right to remedy. The third part of the paper would elaborate on all the types of writ remedies and its usage in the Indian Legal System. The last part of the paper would be the conclusion that would deal with appraisal and the critical analysis of writs. The purpose of this paper is to celebrate writs as a powerful constitution remedy and highlight the importance of the same in th…

Dishonour of Cheque: Punishment under NI Act

INTRODUCTION:Negotiable Instrument literally means any promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque, and in easier terms, it means a piece of paper which will hold the promisee to claim some amount of money out of the paper. Section 6 of the Negotiable Instruments Act defines the word cheque. It further is classified as Bearer Cheque, Crossed Cheque, Self Cheque, Post-dated cheque, Banker’s cheque and traveller’s cheque. In general sense, cheques are the easiest way to transact in the present times. One may easily transfer money through cheques over long distances on a daily basis. On one hand, wherein cheques are used to transact daily over the relationship of trust, it is always advisable on the face of it during transactions that the cheque be issued in the crossed account payee section to avoid its misuse. It is also stated that the transactions as these cheques are not negotiable to any other person than payee, it gives a prima facie advantage to both of them. In a layman’s langua…